Skip to main content

Education

Ph.D., economics, University of Arizona; M.A., economics, Kyiv School of Economics; B.A., economics, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy

Summary

Dr. Maryanchyk specializes in applying microeconomics, industrial organization theory, and statistics to litigation involving intellectual property, antitrust, and commercial disputes. He has worked on behalf of private clients, and his governmental clients have included the US Federal Trade Commission, the US Department of Justice, the US Federal Communications Commission, and the Competition Bureau of Canada. He has also supported attorneys and experts in all phases of the litigation process, from developing case strategy to assisting in the preparation of expert testimony. Dr. Maryanchyk has designed and conducted analyses in intellectual property matters related to high-tech products, consumer electronics, and telecommunications devices. In a notable high-tech patent infringement suit, he supported two affiliated experts in developing analyses and testimony to establish a damages estimate. In a prominent commercial dispute case, Dr. Maryanchyk designed and implemented analyses of the economic impact of a natural disaster on classes of homeowners. Among his antitrust case work have been matters in the advertising, telecommunications, internet-related services, payment card, transportation, agriculture, airline, food and beverage, and health care sectors.

Selected Cases

Competitive Analysis of Canadian Pacific/Kansas City Southern Railway Merger

An Analysis Group team worked with academic affiliates John Mayo and Jeffrey Macher to provide economic expertise, analysis, and testimony on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway (NS), represented by Weil, Gotshal and Manges, in proceedings related to the proposed merger between Canadian Pacific Railway (CP) and Kansas City Southern Railway (KCS).

Read More

Apple Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc. (antitrust)

Analysis Group was retained on behalf of Qualcomm in an antitrust dispute with Apple in the US District Court for the Southern District of California.

Read More

Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. Apple

In a patent infringement suit brought against Apple by Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (WARF), an Analysis Group team supported two affiliates in developing analyses and testimony to establish a damages estimate.
Read More

Related News

  • GCR Antitrust Awards 2025: Analysis Group Case Work and Managing Principal Aaron Yeater Nominated for Multiple Competition Awards
    Read More
/